How should partners handle suspected fake submissions?

Short answer

Report the factual indicators through the abuse process and avoid further unnecessary disclosure. Suspected spam should not become an unsupported judgment about insurance eligibility.

An illustrative example

A request contains repeated inconsistent contact details.

This is a hypothetical situation, not a real customer outcome or a coverage determination.

Three facts to prepare

• Observed indicators
• Request references
• Contact status

Use a brief, accurate summary. Separate confirmed facts from assumptions; keep passwords, identity numbers, private customer records and confidential documents out of an initial marketplace request.

A question to bring to the right professional

What review can establish whether this is marketplace abuse?

Use current offer status, applicable agreements and the customer's actual permission. Free participation does not authorize resale, unlimited follow-up or unrelated use of information. Prioritize prompt professional service, accurate records and stop-contact requests; use support when an issue requires investigation or operational action.

Sources and scope

• LunarQuote privacy notice

  The published privacy notice. Use the designated support process for a request or complaint; this guide is not an independent legal review of the notice.

• LunarQuote marketplace disclosures

  The marketplace's stated role and limitations. Current agreements, verified eligibility and request status govern actual participation.

Sources supply the stated background, not a determination about the illustrative case. The example, checklist and discussion prompt are LunarQuote educational material. Source links checked October 5, 2026.